How is the American public supposed to pay attention to terror threats that are based on old information?
Most of the al Qaeda surveillance of five financial institutions that led to a new terrorism alert Sunday was conducted before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and authorities are not sure whether the casing of the buildings has continued since then, numerous intelligence and law enforcement officials said yesterday.More than half a dozen government officials interviewed yesterday, who declined to be identified because classified information is involved, said that most, if not all, of the information about the buildings seized by authorities in a raid in Pakistan last week was about three years old, and possibly older.
"There is nothing right now that we're hearing that is new," said one senior law enforcement official who was briefed on the alert. "Why did we go to this level? . . . I still don't know that."
...
Numerous officials said yesterday, however, that most of the information was compiled prior to the Sept. 11 attacks and that there are serious doubts about the age of other, undated files. One senior counterterrorism official said many of the documents include dates prior to Sept. 11, 2001, but there are no dates after that.
This sounds a lot like the WMD problem. Assumptions made on faulty or old intelligence. Where were so sure Iraq had WMD, except for the fact they probably got rid of them a long time ago. I do not see how you can sow the seeds of fear based on our enemy's old intelligence.
Comments (2)
This just in: The British are coming! The British are coming!
Posted by Michael | August 3, 2004 10:05 AM
Posted on August 3, 2004 10:05
heh.
Posted by sean | August 3, 2004 10:14 AM
Posted on August 3, 2004 10:14