Olbermann is pushing the story...
This is mentioned because there is a small but blood-curdling set of news stories that right now exists somewhere between the world of investigative journalism, and the world of the Reynolds Wrap Hat. And while the group’s ultimate home remains unclear - so might our election of just a week ago.Stories like these have filled the web since the tide turned against John Kerry late Tuesday night. But not until Friday did they begin to spill into the more conventional news media. That’s when the Cincinnati Enquirer reported that officials in Warren County, Ohio, had “locked down” its administration building to prevent anybody from observing the vote count there.
Suspicious enough on the face of it, the decision got more dubious still when County Commissioners confirmed that they were acting on the advice of their Emergency Services Director, Frank Young. Mr. Young had explained that he had been advised by the federal government to implement the measures for the sake of Homeland Security. [...]
Thus the majority of the media has yet to touch the other stories of Ohio (the amazing Bush Times Ten voting machine in Gahanna) or the sagas of Ohio South: huge margins for Bush in Florida counties in which registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans 2-1, places where the optical scanning of precinct totals seems to have turned results from perfect matches for the pro-Kerry exit poll data, to Bush sweeps.
Of course, the unmedia types in the blogosphere are pushing this story, but it does have its merits. The 4000+ extra votes for Bush in Franklin County alone should raise the alert status. I really hope these stories don't turn into a Watergate-type thing, because then that would really be bad for the country. Giving Bush another term is bad enough.
Comments (3)
Why use all the conspiracy talk? Some things are conspiracies. I've been reading about this since early 2001. I believe the vote was rigged in 2000 and again in 2004. Why would they let us vote if they could get away with disenfranchisement? We're just in the way.
Posted by eRobin | November 8, 2004 4:31 PM
Posted on November 8, 2004 16:31
Because, my dear eRobin, if it does turn out to be the cold hard truth, then that will be extremely bad for all of us. I just hope it's all a bunch of conspiracy talk. Because another Watergate would be way worse than four more years.
Posted by sean | November 9, 2004 4:21 PM
Posted on November 9, 2004 16:21
The sad thing is that we're likely to really never know. I mean, if Bush has pulled this off as many people think, and there's so little talk and even less concern about it, where does that leave us?
Certainly it does not leave us a free democratic republic. :(
Posted by Rick Horowitz | November 29, 2004 10:14 AM
Posted on November 29, 2004 10:14