That's why we want to know what they're up to.
COLUMBUS - Gov. Bob Taft's office has rejected a Blade request made under the Ohio Open Records Act that asked for the appointment calendars from members of the governor's staff, including former chief of staff Brian Hicks."Mr. Hicks' calendar, which contains both personal and professional appointments, was kept for his personal convenience and does not serve to document the activities of the office," the governor's chief legal counsel, Elizabeth Luper Schuster, said in a July 6 letter.
Ms. Schuster justified this decision by citing International Union vs. Voinovich, a 1995 ruling by Ohio's 10th District Court of Appeals.
Written before the dominance of calendar and e-mail programs like Microsoft Outlook and Lotus Notes, the case states that the governor has no obligation to disclose any appointments because he is not legally required to maintain any records of them.
Attorneys for then-Gov. George Voinovich said he did keep personal calendars "but denies that he utilizes them to document his official actions."
As a result, the ruling concluded that only the official schedules released by the governor's press office qualify as available public records.
State Sen. Marc Dann (D., Youngstown) challenged Mr. Taft's invocation of International Union vs. Voinovich to protect his former chief of staff.
"Brian Hicks was paid by the state of Ohio," he said. "He wasn't the governor's employee. He was the people's employee."
That pretty much sums it up. If our tax dollars are being used to bend us over. I think the public has a right to know. Once again, though, it won't matter. These guys are fixin' to go down hardcore. Take a look at these numbers from Kos.
I've got the following info from a trusted source. It's a Republican poll out of Ohio. But I couldn't get the baseline info on the poll -- pollster and date taken. So take with appropriate grain of salt.Pollster Unknown. 501 Republicans. 501 Independent and Swing voters. Date unknown. (No trend lines)
501 Republicans voters polled on Republican candidatesFav / Unfav / Would vote for
Montgomery 49% 39% 44%
Petro 42% 46% 40%
Blackwell 44% 50% 43%501 Independents and Swing voters polled on Republican candidates.
Fav / Unfav / Would vote for
Montgomery 46% 42% 26%
Petro 54% 33% 42%
Blackwell 22% 60% 23%Head to head, polling all voters.
Strickland (D) 58
Blackwell (R) 36Coleman (D) 49
Blackwell (R) 42Strickland (D) 50
Kasich (R) 41Coleman (D) 43
Kasich (R) 45Strickland (D) 51
Petro (R) 44Coleman (D) 44
Petro (R) 44
Strickland (D) 52
Montgomery (R) 39Coleman (D) 48
Montgomery (R) 42
[...]
What we are looking at is the complete disintegration of the Ohio Republican Party.
We can only hope.
Comments (3)
Hello!
After a decade or so of the GOP screwing up Ohio it would be nice to see some political payback. I'm kind of doubtful it would happen, though.
I have only recently found your blog. I liked the post below about a judge displaying the Koran. The theocons would go apesh*t if any judge did that; the only approved religious display is the Bible, as in whichever version approved by Dobson/Robertson/Frist/DeLay/Bush etc. No one else need apply.
Do you know of any good libertarian blogs based in Ohio or in general?
Phalanx38
Posted by Phalanx38 | July 9, 2005 1:58 PM
Posted on July 9, 2005 13:58
Thanks for the kind words. If you're looking for a good libertarian blog, QandO is where it's at. Just tell Jon Henke that Sean from Nosey Online sent you.
Posted by sean | July 9, 2005 4:36 PM
Posted on July 9, 2005 16:36
FYI that poll you cited has been called into question by the Mystery Pollster. Keep being nosey; it's high time we bring these crooks down!
Posted by The Ticked Off Ohioan | July 9, 2005 10:05 PM
Posted on July 9, 2005 22:05